Data and Code for: Law and Norms: Empirical Evidence
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Tom Lane, University of Nottingham Ningbo China; Daniele Nosenzo, Aarhus University; Silvia Sonderegger, University of Nottingham
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
text/plain | 333.2 KB | 03/07/2023 08:29:PM |
|
application/x-stata-dta | 673.7 KB | 01/19/2023 06:45:AM |
|
application/x-stata-dta | 55.8 MB | 01/19/2023 06:37:AM |
|
application/x-stata-dta | 688.3 KB | 01/19/2023 06:37:AM |
|
application/x-stata-dta | 732.2 KB | 01/19/2023 06:38:AM |
|
application/x-stata-dta | 11.4 MB | 01/19/2023 06:37:AM |
|
application/pdf | 178.4 KB | 03/07/2023 03:43:PM |
|
application/x-stata-dta | 165 KB | 01/19/2023 06:37:AM |
|
application/x-stata-dta | 328.7 KB | 01/19/2023 06:37:AM |
|
application/x-stata-dta | 330.7 KB | 01/19/2023 06:37:AM |
- Total of 16 records. Records per page
- « previous Page of 2
- next »
Project Citation:
Lane, Tom, Nosenzo, Daniele, and Sonderegger, Silvia. Data and Code for: Law and Norms: Empirical Evidence. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2023. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2023-04-17. https://doi.org/10.3886/E182995V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Data and code accompanying the article Law and Norms: Empirical Evidence, American Economic Review
Abstract: A large theoretical literature argues laws exert a causal effect on norms, but empirical evidence remains scant. Using a novel identification strategy, we provide a compelling empirical test of this proposition. We use incentivized vignette experiments to directly measure social norms relating to actions subject to legal thresholds. Our large-scale experiments (n=7000) run in the UK, US and China show that laws can causally influence social norms. Results are robust across different samples and methods of measuring norms, and are consistent with a model of social image concerns where individuals care about the inferences others make about their underlying prosociality.
Abstract: A large theoretical literature argues laws exert a causal effect on norms, but empirical evidence remains scant. Using a novel identification strategy, we provide a compelling empirical test of this proposition. We use incentivized vignette experiments to directly measure social norms relating to actions subject to legal thresholds. Our large-scale experiments (n=7000) run in the UK, US and China show that laws can causally influence social norms. Results are robust across different samples and methods of measuring norms, and are consistent with a model of social image concerns where individuals care about the inferences others make about their underlying prosociality.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
Social norms;
Law;
Expressive function of law
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
C91 Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
C92 Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
D90 Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: General
K10 Basic Areas of Law: General (Constitutional Law)
K42 Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
C91 Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
C92 Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
D90 Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: General
K10 Basic Areas of Law: General (Constitutional Law)
K42 Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
United Kingdom,
China,
United States
Collection Date(s):
View help for Collection Date(s)
2017 – 2022
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
experimental data
Methodology
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Individual
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.