Employment-based contingency management for women arrested for prostitution
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Anthony DeFulio, Western Michigan University
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet | 348.8 KB | 07/12/2022 12:48:PM |
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet | 83.6 KB | 07/08/2022 08:48:AM |
Project Citation:
DeFulio, Anthony. Employment-based contingency management for women arrested for prostitution . Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-07-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E175121V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This study was a preliminary evaluation of the therapeutic workplace
intervention in opioid dependent women arrested for prostitution. Participants
(N = 37) were randomly assigned to a specialized diversion program, or the
diversion program plus the therapeutic workplace for four months. To
be included in the present study, participants were required to be enrolled in
medication-assisted treatment (i.e., methadone or buprenorphine) for the
treatment of opioid use disorder and referred to the study by social workers employed
by a State’s Attorneys’ Office. Participants were paid $8.00 per hour for up to four
hours each day. In addition, participants earned bonus pay based on performance
on the job training programs. This bonus pay varied but was programmed to be
approximately $2.00 per hour for average performance. Participants could track
their earnings via their computer workstation and request to convert their
electronic funds to gift cards of their choice as they saw fit. Access to the
workplace (and thus wages) was contingent upon provision of a urine sample
every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.
For
the first two weeks, participants in the therapeutic workplace group could gain
access to the workplace independent of the results of the urine toxicology
test. Thereafter, drug abstinence reinforcement contingencies were implemented,
starting with cocaine abstinence. Under this contingency, participants were
required to submit cocaine-negative urine samples to access the workplace and
maintain the maximum hourly wage. If the sample was positive for cocaine or the
sample was not submitted, then the participant was not permitted to enter the
workplace, and the rate of hourly pay was decreased to $1.00. Thereafter, each
day that the participant gained access to the workplace their base pay was
increased by $1.00 per hour until fully restored. When a participant successfully completed two
consecutive weeks of cocaine abstinence, opioid abstinence contingencies were
added. Similarly, after four consecutive weeks of cocaine and opioid
abstinence, additional contingencies for cannabis, amphetamines, and PCP were
added simultaneously. This terminal set of abstinence requirements included the
complete panel of drugs that are typically used in pre-employment drug
screening. Participants
who submitted at least 10 drug negative urine samples across their last 12
submitted samples, and who attended a minimum of 10 days in the last 20
possible workdays were admitted to the four-month wage supplement program.
Under the wage supplement program, participants who became employed in the
community or who engaged in verifiable job search activities were paid $4 per
hour for each hour of verified work or job searching, up to 40 hours per week.
During this period, drug abstinence was verified by a drug testing of urine
samples that were required once per week on average.
Funding Sources:
View help for Funding Sources
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse (R34DA033141)
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
Contingency management;
opioids;
employment
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
Baltimore
Time Period(s):
View help for Time Period(s)
3/1/2013 – 12/31/2014 (2013 and 2014)
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.