Evaluation of SPOR Diabetes Action Canada

Principal Investigator(s):  View help for Principal Investigator(s) Mathieu Ouimet, Université Laval

Version:  View help for Version V1

Name File Type Size Last Modified
DAC_SNA_2019_DB.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 129.6 KB 06/27/2022 11:37:PM
DAC_SNA_2020_DB.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 342 KB 06/27/2022 11:37:PM

Project Citation: 

Ouimet, Mathieu. Evaluation of SPOR Diabetes Action Canada . Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-06-28. https://doi.org/10.3886/E173801V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary The two databases were created as part of the evaluation of Diabetes Action Canada (https://diabetesaction.ca/). They contain social network cross-sectional data.

Scope of Project

Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Canada
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 4/1/2018 – 3/31/2020
Universe:  View help for Universe Researchers, patient partners, administrators and members of the governance council of Diabetes Action Canada who were active during the time coverage of both cross-sectional surveys.
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) survey data
Collection Notes:  View help for Collection Notes The two web surveys were conducted on Qualtrics.

Methodology

Response Rate:  View help for Response Rate - 2019 survey: 42.7%
- 2020 survey: 51.9%
Sampling:  View help for Sampling Population-based survey
Data Source:  View help for Data Source The surveys were conducted as part of the evaluation of Diabetes Action Canada, a SPOR research network. 
Collection Mode(s):  View help for Collection Mode(s) web-based survey
Scales:  View help for Scales A Likert-type scale was used to measure the frequency of inter-individual relationships between network members: 

0 = it's me
0 = No contact
3 = Yearly 
4 = Quarterly 
5 = Monthly 
6 = Weekly 
7 = Daily 

The other columns capture the topic(s) discussed between members, where: 0 = Topic not discussed 1 = Topic discussed. Due to the evolution of the network and the participants in both surveys, there is no correspondence between the IDs of 2019 and 2020 databases. The relationships in the two databases are not symmetrical. In our study, we have symmetrized them. Specifically, when respondent A indicated that he or she had a relationship with actor B, and actor B, also a respondent, did not indicate this relationship, the relationship was counted. When A indicated a relationship of frequency 4 while C indicated a relationship with A, but of frequency 3, we used 4, the highest frequency. When A indicated having discussed topic X with B, while B did not confirm having discussed this topic with A, it was considered that topic X had been discussed between A and B.
Weights:  View help for Weights Does not apply
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Relationships between two individuals
Geographic Unit:  View help for Geographic Unit Canadian province or region

Related Publications

Download this project

Published Versions

V1 [2022-06-28]

Export Metadata

Dublin Core

DDI 2.5

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.