Name File Type Size Last Modified
  Baseline 11/18/2022 11:47:AM
  Online-Appendix 11/18/2022 11:49:AM
README.txt text/plain 14.5 KB 11/17/2022 04:54:PM
monopsony_master_clean.do text/plain 3.7 KB 11/18/2022 06:49:AM

Project Citation: 

Yeh, Chen, Macaluso, Claudia, and Hershbein, Brad. Code for: “Monopsony in the U.S. Labor Market.” Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2022. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-11-28. https://doi.org/10.3886/E162581V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary
This paper quantifies employer market power in U.S. manufacturing and how it has changed over time. Using administrative data, we estimate plant-level markdowns—the ratio between a plant’s marginal revenue product of labor and its wage. We find most manufacturing plants operate in a monopsonistic environment, with an average markdown of 1.53, implying a worker earning only 65 cents on the marginal dollar generated. To investigate long-term trends for the entire sector, we propose a novel, theoretically grounded measure for the aggregate markdown. We find that it decreased between the late 1970s and the early 2000s, but has been sharply increasing since.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms monopsony; markdowns; production function estimation; wages; secular trends; Census data
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      E24 Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity
      J20 Demand and Supply of Labor: General
      J31 Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
      J42 Monopsony; Segmented Labor Markets


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.