Name File Type Size Last Modified
  data 04/14/2022 08:54:AM
  derived 04/14/2022 08:56:AM
  empirical results 04/14/2022 08:56:AM
  fig 04/14/2022 08:56:AM
  routines 04/14/2022 08:54:AM
LICENSE_code.txt text/plain 1.5 KB 04/14/2022 04:54:AM
LICENSE_data.txt text/plain 20.4 KB 04/14/2022 04:54:AM
code0_setup.do text/plain 447 bytes 04/14/2022 04:54:AM
code1_prepareStataFile.m text/x-matlab 12.4 KB 04/14/2022 04:54:AM
code2_deriveFiscalShocks.do text/plain 4.7 KB 04/14/2022 04:54:AM

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary This is data and code to replicate the paper. The abstract of the paper as follows:

The hoped-for silver lining of euro-area austerity programs was to raise external competitiveness and improve current accounts. Using product- and industry-level data for 12 countries over 1999-2018, we show that reductions in government spending reduce prices and wages, but only for products with low import content and industries with low export shares. This leads to asymmetric expenditure switching, with net exports improving through lower imports rather than higher exports. The standard small-open-economy model fails to rationalize these findings, but home bias in government spending and frictions preventing factor prices from equalizing across sectors, considerably improves the fit of the model.


Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms Spending multipliers; currency union; current account
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      E62 Fiscal Policy
      F41 Open Economy Macroeconomics
      F45 Macroeconomic Issues of Monetary Unions
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Euro area
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) aggregate data

Methodology

Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation country, industry

Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.