Reducing Burnout and Resignations among Frontline Workers: A Field Experiment
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Elizabeth Linos, University of California, Berkeley; Krista Ruffini, Georgetown University; Stephanie Wilcoxen, Behavioural Insights Team
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
replication | 08/26/2021 01:51:PM |
Project Citation:
Linos, Elizabeth, Ruffini, Krista, and Wilcoxen, Stephanie. Reducing Burnout and Resignations among Frontline Workers: A Field Experiment. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2021-08-26. https://doi.org/10.3886/E148502V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Government agencies around the world struggle to retain frontline workers, as high job demands
and low job resources contribute to persistently high rates of employee burnout. Although four
decades of research have documented the predictors and potential costs of frontline worker
burnout, we have limited causal evidence on strategies that reduce it. In this article, we report on
a multi-city field experiment (n=536) aimed at increasing perceived social support and affirming
belonging among 911 dispatchers. We find that a six-week intervention that prompts dispatchers
to share advice anonymously and asynchronously with their peers in other cities reduces burnout
by 8 points (0.4 SD) and cuts resignations by more than half (3.4 percentage points) four months
after the intervention ended. We provide supporting evidence that the intervention operates by
increasing perceived social support and belonging in an online laboratory experiment (n=497).
These findings suggest that low-cost belonging affirmation techniques can reduce frontline
worker burnout and help agencies retain workers, saving a mid-sized city at least $400,000 in
personnel costs.
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.