Name File Type Size Last Modified
  Code 08/20/2021 08:42:AM
  Data 08/20/2021 08:42:AM
  Software and instructions 08/20/2021 08:43:AM
README.pdf application/pdf 157 KB 08/20/2021 04:42:AM

Project Citation: 

Goeree, Jacob K., and Louis, Philippos. Data and code for: M Equilibrium: A Theory of Beliefs and Choices in Games. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2021. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2021-11-19. https://doi.org/10.3886/E145561V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary We introduce a set-valued solution concept, M equilibrium, to capture empirical regularities from over half a century of game-theory experiments. We show M equilibrium serves as a meta theory for various models that hitherto were considered unrelated. M equilibrium is empirically robust and, despite being set-valued, falsifiable. Results from a series of experiments that compare M equilibrium to leading behavioral-game-theory models demonstrate its virtues in predicting observed choices and stated beliefs. Data from experimental games with a unique pure-strategy Nash equilibrium and multiple M equilibria exhibit coordination problems that could not be anticipated through the lens of existing models.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms human behavior; economic behavior; games
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      C72 Noncooperative Games
      C92 Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Collection Date(s):  View help for Collection Date(s) 9/1/2018 – 10/31/2018

Methodology

Sampling:  View help for Sampling A random sample of individuals registered with the UCY - LExEcon standard subject pool was invited through email and registered at a first-come-first-served basis to the available experimental sessions. Role assignment within each session was randomized.
Collection Mode(s):  View help for Collection Mode(s) other

Related Publications

Unable to retrieve related publications.

Loading usage statistics...

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.