Are Resource Booms a Blessing or a Curse? Evidence from People (not Places)

Principal Investigator(s):  View help for Principal Investigator(s) Grant Jacobsen, University of Oregon; Dominic Parker, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Justin Winikoff, United States Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service

Version:  View help for Version V1

Name File Type Size Last Modified

Project Citation: 

Jacobsen, Grant, Parker, Dominic, and Winikoff, Justin. Are Resource Booms a Blessing or a Curse? Evidence from People (not Places). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2021-01-19. https://doi.org/10.3886/E130701V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary We provide the first estimates of the long-run income effects of temporary resource booms on people, rather than places, focusing on the U.S. oil boom and bust of the 1980s. Using household-level longitudinal data, we find positive effects during the boom period and negative effects during the bust period.  The cumulative effect through 2012 was arguably negative when restricting the sample to prime working years (<55) and unambiguously positive otherwise because the boom delayed retirement.  The evidence suggests the boom was ultimately a curse for the average household. It failed to generate net income gains during prime age and its volatility caused costly income-smoothing later in life.



Related Publications

Download this project

Published Versions

V1 [2021-01-19]

Export Metadata

Dublin Core

DDI 2.5

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.