Search openICPSR


Find and share social, behavioral, and health sciences research data.

  • Search terms can be anywhere in the study: title, description, variables, etc.
  • Because our holdings are large, we recommend using at least two query terms:
    rural economy
    home ownership
    higher education
    ghana adolescents
  • Keywords help delimit the breadth of results. Therefore, use as many as required to achieve your desired results:
    elementary education federal funding
  • Our search will find studies with derivative expressions of your query terms: A search for "nation" will find results containing "national"
  • Use quotes to search for an exact expression:
    "social mobility"
  • You can combine exact expressions with loose terms:
    "united states" inmates
  • Exclude results by using a MINUS sign:
    elections -sweden -germany
    elections -sweden -germany
  • On the results page, you will be able to sort and filter to further refine results.
  • Please note that your search queries only openICPSR data holdings.
CLOSE
Name File Type Size Last Modified
  1 - Programs and Files for Data Collection 04/22/2020 02:22:AM
  2 - Raw Data 04/22/2020 02:21:AM
  3 - Processed Data 04/22/2020 02:29:AM
  4 - Data Analysis 04/22/2020 02:21:AM
README_Chen_Chen_Riyanto.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 17.5 KB 04/21/2020 10:21:PM

Project Citation: 

Chen, Roy, Chen, Yan, and Riyanto, Yohanes E. Best practices in replication: A case study of common information in coordination games. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2020-04-23. https://doi.org/10.3886/E119065V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary
This project contains the materials used and collected for the paper "Best practices in replication: A case study of common information in coordination games," accepted for publication in Experimental Economics.

The paper examines a case of non-replication in experimental economics. An original study, Chen and Chen (2011), was not replicated successfully by Camerer et al. (2016). We find that a seemingly minor protocol deviation, not reading the instructions aloud to the subjects, is likely responsible for this non-replication. We test the importance of common information in another replication run by the third author.

Materials included are:
1) Programs and files used for data collection (zTree), and all instructions used
2) Raw data generated by zTree
3) Processed data and programs used to process the data (Stata)
4) Analysis files (Stata and Matlab)
5) README file containing descriptions of the other files
Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources Ministry of Education (Singapore) Tier 1 grant (M4011490); National Univesity of Singapore (Economics Department grant)

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms replication; experimental economics; reproducibility
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage United States, Michigan, Singapore


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.