Data and Code for "Using Place-Based Jobs Policies to Help Distressed Communities"
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Timothy Bartik, Upjohn Institute
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/pdf | 60 KB | 05/28/2020 07:58:PM |
|
application/pdf | 60 KB | 05/28/2020 07:58:PM |
|
application/vnd.ms-excel | 199.5 KB | 05/28/2020 07:58:PM |
|
application/pdf | 95.3 KB | 05/28/2020 07:58:PM |
|
application/pdf | 164.9 KB | 05/28/2020 07:58:PM |
|
application/pdf | 96.1 KB | 05/28/2020 07:58:PM |
|
application/pdf | 165.2 KB | 05/28/2020 07:58:PM |
|
text/plain | 66.9 KB | 05/28/2020 07:58:PM |
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet | 7 KB | 05/28/2020 07:58:PM |
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet | 11 KB | 05/28/2020 07:58:PM |
- Total of 28 records. Records per page
- « previous Page of 3
- next »
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Place-based jobs policies seek to create jobs in particular
local labor markets. Such policies are currently most widely used by state and
local governments, which current devote almost $50 billion in annual resources
to encouraging individual businesses to create jobs by tax incentives, cash
grants, and customized public services. The most persuasive rationale for such
policies is that they can advance equity goals and economic efficiency by
increasing employment rates in distressed local labor markets, which currently
have high rates of nonemployment. Local job creation in such distressed local
labor markets can have large, long-term benefits for increasing employment rates
and earnings per capita of local residents. The net benefits of place-based
jobs policies also depend on the costs of job creation. Tax incentives have
relatively high costs, while public services to business show some potential
for having much lower costs per job created. Reforms in place-based jobs policies
should aim at: targeting distressed local labor markets; focusing more on
businesses with high local job multipliers; relying less on incentives, and
more on public services that enhance business inputs; designing policies so
that they can be better evaluated, via better comparison groups. These reforms
can be pursued by state and local governments, acting in the best interests of
their residents. But the right kind of federal intervention can also advance
equity goals and efficiency by discouraging excessive use of tax incentives,
and helping distressed local labor markets with block grants which allow the flexibility to respond to local circumstances.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
Place-based policy;
Local labor markets;
Job creation
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
J68 Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies: Public Policy
R12 Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity
R38 Production Analysis and Firm Location: Government Policy
R58 Regional Development Planning and Policy
J68 Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies: Public Policy
R12 Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity
R38 Production Analysis and Firm Location: Government Policy
R58 Regional Development Planning and Policy
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
United States
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.