Name File Type Size Last Modified
JEP_Figure_1 state incentives and employment rate.pdf application/pdf 60 KB 05/28/2020 07:58:PM
JEP_Figure_1.pdf application/pdf 60 KB 05/28/2020 07:58:PM
JEP_employment_levels_CZ_groups.xls application/vnd.ms-excel 199.5 KB 05/28/2020 07:58:PM
JEP_graphs_diff_ER_diff_200kCZs.pdf application/pdf 95.3 KB 05/28/2020 07:58:PM
JEP_graphs_diff_ER_diff_allCZs.pdf application/pdf 164.9 KB 05/28/2020 07:58:PM
JEP_graphs_diff_ln_emp_diff_200kCZs.pdf application/pdf 96.1 KB 05/28/2020 07:58:PM
JEP_graphs_diff_ln_emp_diff_allCZs.pdf application/pdf 165.2 KB 05/28/2020 07:58:PM
JEP_incentive_analysis.smcl text/plain 66.9 KB 05/28/2020 07:58:PM
JEP_incentive_analysis_data.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 7 KB 05/28/2020 07:58:PM
JEP_incentive_analysis_dstats.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 11 KB 05/28/2020 07:58:PM

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Place-based jobs policies seek to create jobs in particular local labor markets. Such policies are currently most widely used by state and local governments, which current devote almost $50 billion in annual resources to encouraging individual businesses to create jobs by tax incentives, cash grants, and customized public services. The most persuasive rationale for such policies is that they can advance equity goals and economic efficiency by increasing employment rates in distressed local labor markets, which currently have high rates of nonemployment. Local job creation in such distressed local labor markets can have large, long-term benefits for increasing employment rates and earnings per capita of local residents. The net benefits of place-based jobs policies also depend on the costs of job creation. Tax incentives have relatively high costs, while public services to business show some potential for having much lower costs per job created. Reforms in place-based jobs policies should aim at: targeting distressed local labor markets; focusing more on businesses with high local job multipliers; relying less on incentives, and more on public services that enhance business inputs; designing policies so that they can be better evaluated, via better comparison groups. These reforms can be pursued by state and local governments, acting in the best interests of their residents. But the right kind of federal intervention can also advance equity goals and efficiency by discouraging excessive use of tax incentives, and helping distressed local labor markets with block grants which allow the flexibility to respond to local circumstances.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms Place-based policy; Local labor markets; Job creation
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      J68 Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies: Public Policy
      R12 Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity
      R38 Production Analysis and Firm Location: Government Policy
      R58 Regional Development Planning and Policy
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage United States


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.