A newer version of this project is available. See below for other available versions.
Data and Code for "Do Sounder Banks Make Calmer Waters? The Link Between Bank Regulations and Capital Flow Waves
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Kristin Forbes, MIT-Sloan School of Management
Version: View help for Version V2
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet | 237.1 KB | 01/05/2020 01:24:PM |
Project Citation:
Forbes, Kristin. Data and Code for "Do Sounder Banks Make Calmer Waters? The Link Between Bank Regulations and Capital Flow Waves. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2020. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2020-02-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E117082V2
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This paper tests if
prudential and macroprudential regulations have meaningfully reduced the
incidence of capital flow “waves”, i.e., of sudden stops and surges of capital
flows from abroad. The results support other work documenting changes since
2008 in how global factors affect capital flows, but provide mixed evidence on
how regulations have affected the incidence of sharp capital flow movements.
Regulations that strengthen banks (such as higher capital-asset ratios)
meaningfully reduce the incidence of surges, but tighter macroprudential
regulations appear to have done little to reduce the incidence of capital flow
waves—and are even correlated with an increased risk of sudden stops. This may
reflect their limited use to date, or how they interact with different types of
capital flows. Macroprudential regulations may have reduced the volume and
volatility of bank flows, but shifted financial intermediation outside the
regulated sector and thereby increased the volatility of debt and equity flows.
These reforms could still provide important benefits, however, in terms of
building the resilience of banks and thereby mitigating the negative effects of
capital flow waves on the broader economy. Even if the waters are not much
calmer, the waves should do less damage.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
prudential regulation;
macroprudential regulation;
capital flows;
sudden stops;
surges;
risk factors;
global financial cycle;
extreme capital flow episode
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
F38 International Financial Policy: Financial Transactions Tax; Capital Controls
F62 Economic Impacts of Globalization: Macroeconomic Impacts
G15 International Financial Markets
G28 Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation
G38 Corporate Finance and Governance: Government Policy and Regulation
F38 International Financial Policy: Financial Transactions Tax; Capital Controls
F62 Economic Impacts of Globalization: Macroeconomic Impacts
G15 International Financial Markets
G28 Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation
G38 Corporate Finance and Governance: Government Policy and Regulation
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.