Replication data for: Voter Response to Peak and End Transfers: Evidence from a Conditional Cash Transfer Experiment
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Sebastian Galiani; Nadya Hajj; Patrick J. McEwan; Pablo Ibarrarán; Nandita Krishnaswamy
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
DHS | 12/07/2019 04:21:PM | ||
|
application/pdf | 44.1 KB | 12/07/2019 11:21:AM |
|
text/plain | 19.3 KB | 12/07/2019 11:21:AM |
|
application/octet-stream | 73.3 KB | 12/07/2019 11:21:AM |
|
application/octet-stream | 21.6 KB | 12/07/2019 11:21:AM |
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
In a Honduran field experiment, sequences of cash transfers to poor households varied in amount of the largest (peak) and last (end) transfers. Larger peak-end transfers increased voter turnout and the incumbent party's vote share in the 2013 presidential election, independently of cumulative transfers. A plausible explanation is that voters succumbed to a common cognitive bias by applying peak-end heuristics. Another is that voters deliberately used peak-end transfers to update beliefs about the incumbent party. In either case, the results provide experimental evidence on the classic non-experimental finding that voters are especially sensitive to recent economic activity.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
C93 Field Experiments
D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
I32 Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
O15 Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
O17 Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
C93 Field Experiments
D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
I32 Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
O15 Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
O17 Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.