Name File Type Size Last Modified
  DHS 12/07/2019 04:21:PM
ReadMe.pdf application/pdf 44.1 KB 12/07/2019 11:21:AM
bono10000.do text/plain 19.3 KB 12/07/2019 11:21:AM
bono10000.dta application/octet-stream 73.3 KB 12/07/2019 11:21:AM
prafii.dta application/octet-stream 21.6 KB 12/07/2019 11:21:AM

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary In a Honduran field experiment, sequences of cash transfers to poor households varied in amount of the largest (peak) and last (end) transfers. Larger peak-end transfers increased voter turnout and the incumbent party's vote share in the 2013 presidential election, independently of cumulative transfers. A plausible explanation is that voters succumbed to a common cognitive bias by applying peak-end heuristics. Another is that voters deliberately used peak-end transfers to update beliefs about the incumbent party. In either case, the results provide experimental evidence on the classic non-experimental finding that voters are especially sensitive to recent economic activity.

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      C93 Field Experiments
      D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
      I32 Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
      O15 Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
      O17 Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.