Replication data for: Two-Sided Matching with (Almost) One-Sided Preferences
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Guillaume Haeringer; Vincent Iehlé
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
data | 12/07/2019 03:10:PM | ||
|
text/plain | 14.6 KB | 12/07/2019 10:10:AM |
Project Citation:
Haeringer, Guillaume, and Iehlé, Vincent. Replication data for: Two-Sided Matching with (Almost) One-Sided Preferences. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2019. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-12-07. https://doi.org/10.3886/E116436V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
In a two-sided matching context we show how we can predict stable matchings by considering only one side's preferences and the mutually acceptable pairs of agents. Our methodology consists of identifying impossible matches, i.e., pairs of agents that can never be matched together in a stable matching of any problem consistent with the partial data. We analyze data from the French academic job market for mathematicians and show that the match of about 45 percent of positions (and about 60 percent of candidates) does not depend on the preferences of the hired candidates, unobserved and submitted at the final stage of the market.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
C78 Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
I23 Higher Education; Research Institutions
J41 Labor Contracts
J44 Professional Labor Markets; Occupational Licensing
C78 Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
I23 Higher Education; Research Institutions
J41 Labor Contracts
J44 Professional Labor Markets; Occupational Licensing
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.