Name File Type Size Last Modified
  analysis 11/15/2019 06:44:AM
  build 11/15/2019 06:44:AM
make_paper.do text/x-stata-syntax 2.9 KB 11/15/2019 01:44:AM

Project Citation: 

Hall, Jonathan D., Palsson, Craig, and Price, Joseph. Replication code and data for “Is Uber a Complement or Substitute with Public Transit?” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-11-15. https://doi.org/10.3886/E115490V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary How Uber affects public transit ridership is a relevant policy question facing cities worldwide. Theoretically, Uber’s effect on transit is ambiguous: while Uber is an alternative mode of travel, it can also increase the reach and flexibility of public transit’s fixed-route, fixed-schedule service. We estimate the effect of Uber on public transit ridership using a difference-in-differences design that exploits variation across U.S. metropolitan areas in both the intensity of Uber penetration and the timing of Uber entry. We find that Uber is a complement for the average transit agency, increasing ridership by five percent after two years. This average effect masks considerable heterogeneity, with Uber increasing ridership more in larger cities and for smaller transit agencies.
Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (Canada)



Related Publications

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.