Replication data for: Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Alma Cohen; Crystal S. Yang
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/pdf | 52.6 KB | 10/13/2019 02:05:AM |
|
text/plain | 27.6 KB | 10/13/2019 02:05:AM |
|
text/plain | 7.3 KB | 10/13/2019 02:05:AM |
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This paper investigates whether judge political affiliation contributes to racial and gender disparities in sentencing using data on over 500,000 federal defendants linked to sentencing judge. Exploiting random case assignment, we find that Republican-appointed judges sentence black defendants to 3.0 more months than similar nonblacks and female defendants to 2.0 fewer months than similar males compared to Democratic-appointed judges, 65 percent of the baseline racial sentence gap and 17 percent of the baseline gender sentence gap, respectively. These differences cannot be explained by other judge characteristics and grow substantially larger when judges are granted more discretion.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
[Sentencing, Criminal Justice System, Judges]
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
J15 Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
J16 Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
K41 Litigation Process
K42 Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
J15 Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
J16 Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
K41 Litigation Process
K42 Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
United States
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
administrative records data
Methodology
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Defendant-Case,
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.