Name File Type Size Last Modified
  RC-Logit-I 10/13/2019 05:33:AM
MLHS.m text/plain 1.9 KB 10/13/2019 01:33:AM
RCLogit_Eurostat_TABLEB3.m text/plain 20.9 KB 10/13/2019 01:33:AM
RCLogit_II.m text/plain 19.9 KB 10/13/2019 01:33:AM
RCLogit_III_extrarcft.m text/plain 20.8 KB 10/13/2019 01:33:AM
RCLogit_IV_extraheterog.m text/plain 21.9 KB 10/13/2019 01:33:AM
RCLogit_V_lifetime.m text/plain 20.7 KB 10/13/2019 01:33:AM
Runall.m text/plain 146 bytes 10/13/2019 01:33:AM
ShareCalculation.m text/plain 1.2 KB 10/13/2019 01:33:AM
ShareCalculationMa.m text/plain 909 bytes 10/13/2019 01:33:AM

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary To what extent do car buyers undervalue future fuel costs, and what does this imply for tax policy? To address both questions, we show it is crucial to account for consumer mileage heterogeneity. We use product-level data for a panel of European countries and exploit fuel cost variation by engine. Despite a modest undervaluation of fuel costs, fuel taxes are more effective in reducing fuel usage than product taxes. They also perform better in terms of welfare, even when usage demand is held fixed. The reason is that fuel taxes better target high mileage consumers to purchase fuel efficient cars.

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
      H25 Business Taxes and Subsidies including sales and value-added (VAT)
      H31 Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents: Household
      L62 Automobiles; Other Transportation Equipment; Related Parts and Equipment
      L71 Mining, Extraction, and Refining: Hydrocarbon Fuels


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.