Replication data for: Trade Agreements and Enforcement: Evidence from WTO Dispute Settlement
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Chad P. Bown; Kara M. Reynolds
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
| AEJPol-2015-0145_Estimation | 10/13/2019 04:10:AM | ||
|
|
text/plain | 14.6 KB | 10/13/2019 12:10:AM |
Project Citation:
Bown, Chad P., and Reynolds, Kara M. Replication data for: Trade Agreements and Enforcement: Evidence from WTO Dispute Settlement. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2017. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-13. https://doi.org/10.3886/E114640V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This paper examines implications of the terms-of-trade theory for the determinants of outcomes arising under the enforcement provisions of international agreements. Like original trade agreement negotiations, formal trade dispute negotiations are modeled as potentially addressing the terms-of-trade externality problem that governments implement import protection above the globally efficient level so as to shift some of the policy's costs onto trading partners. The approach first extends the Bagwell and Staiger (1999, 2011) model from trade agreement accession negotiations to the setting of enforcement negotiations, and the resulting theory guides the empirical assessment on trade volume outcomes from WTO disputes over 1995-2009.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
D74 Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
F13 Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
K33 International Law
D74 Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
F13 Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
K33 International Law
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.