Name File Type Size Last Modified
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/12/2019 09:00:PM
PandP_sipp.dta application/octet-stream 17.6 KB 10/12/2019 09:00:PM
ReadMe.pdf application/pdf 39 KB 10/12/2019 09:00:PM
pandpgraphs_submit.do text/plain 2.1 KB 10/12/2019 09:00:PM
psidss.dta application/octet-stream 16.4 KB 10/12/2019 09:00:PM
unemployment.dta application/octet-stream 2 KB 10/12/2019 09:00:PM
volatility_analysis.do text/plain 477 bytes 10/12/2019 09:00:PM
volatility_data.do text/plain 3 KB 10/12/2019 09:00:PM
volatility_master.do text/plain 2.2 KB 10/12/2019 09:00:PM

Project Citation: 

Carr, Michael D., and Wiemers, Emily E. Replication data for: New Evidence on Earnings Volatility in Survey and Administrative Data. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2018. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-13. https://doi.org/10.3886/E114453V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Despite the rise in cross-sectional inequality since the late 1990s, there is little consensus on trends in earnings volatility during this period. Using consistent samples and methods in administrative earnings data matched to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP GSF) and survey data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), we examine earnings volatility for men from 1978 through 2011. In contrast to the apparent inconsistency in trends across administrative and survey data in the existing literature, we find recent increases in volatility in the SIPP GSF and the PSID, though increases are larger in the PSID.

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      C81 Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
      C83 Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
      J31 Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.