Replication data for: Trying to Understand the PPPs in ICP 2011: Why Are the Results So Different?
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Angus Deaton; Bettina Aten
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
MAC2015-0153_data | 10/12/2019 07:59:PM | ||
|
text/plain | 14.6 KB | 10/12/2019 03:59:PM |
Project Citation:
Deaton, Angus, and Aten, Bettina. Replication data for: Trying to Understand the PPPs in ICP 2011: Why Are the Results So Different? Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2017. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E114119V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Purchasing power parity exchange rates, or PPPs, are price indexes that summarize prices in each country relative to a numeraire country, typically the United States. These numbers are used to compare living standards across countries, by academics in studies of economic growth, particularly through the Penn World Table, by the World Bank to construct measures of global poverty, by the European Union to redistribute resources, and by the international development community to draw attention to discrepancies between rich and poor countries. The International Comparison Program (ICP) collects the detailed prices on which these indexes are based on an irregular basis. In 2014, the ICP published PPPs from the 2011 round that are sharply different from those that were expected from extrapolation of the previous round, ICP 2005. These discrepancies will eventually have important implications for the Penn World Table, and for international comparisons of living standards given that the PPPs are used to convert countries' national accounts--GDP and consumption, for example--from local currency to common currency units (international dollars.) The world according to ICP 2011 looks markedly more equal than the world according to ICP 2005. This paper investigates why this happened. We identify a likely source of the problem in the way that the regions of the ICP were linked in 2005. We use two different methods for measuring the size of the effect. Both suggest that the 2005 PPPs for consumption for countries in Asia (excluding Japan), Western Asia, and Africa were overstated relative to the United States by between 18 to 26 percent. Per capita consumption in international dollars of these countries was therefore too low in 2005 and more likely to be accurately estimated in 2011.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
E31 Price Level; Inflation; Deflation
F31 Foreign Exchange
I31 General Welfare; Well-Being
I32 Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
O11 Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
O19 International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
E31 Price Level; Inflation; Deflation
F31 Foreign Exchange
I31 General Welfare; Well-Being
I32 Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
O11 Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
O19 International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.