Name File Type Size Last Modified
CAN.xls application/octet-stream 547.5 KB 10/12/2019 03:05:PM
DistLabels.xls application/vnd.ms-excel 25 KB 10/12/2019 03:05:PM
Figure2.do text/plain 1.1 KB 10/12/2019 03:05:PM
Figure2_PanelA.m text/plain 3.2 KB 10/12/2019 03:05:PM
Figure2_PanelB.m text/plain 3.2 KB 10/12/2019 03:05:PM
Figure3_PanelA.txt text/plain 1.5 MB 10/12/2019 03:05:PM
Figure3_PanelB.txt text/plain 1.5 MB 10/12/2019 03:05:PM
Table5_eta0_B00.m text/plain 3.3 KB 10/12/2019 03:05:PM
Table5_eta0_B01.m text/plain 3.3 KB 10/12/2019 03:05:PM
Table5_eta1_B00.m text/plain 3.3 KB 10/12/2019 03:05:PM

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary This paper reexamines the evidence on the border effect. We argue that if there is cross-country heterogeneity in the distribution of within-country price differentials, there is no clear benchmark from which to gauge the effect of a border. In the absence of a structural model or a (natural) experiment, it is impossible to separate the "border" effect from the effect of trading with a country with a different distribution of prices. We show that the border effect identified by Engel and Rogers (1996) is entirely driven by the difference in the distribution of prices within the United States and Canada. (JEL F11, F14)

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      F11 Neoclassical Models of Trade
      F14 Empirical Studies of Trade


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.