Replication data for: High-Dimensional Methods and Inference on Structural and Treatment Effects
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Alexandre Belloni; Victor Chernozhukov; Christian Hansen
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
Abortion | 10/21/2021 10:21:AM | ||
EminentDomain | 10/21/2021 10:21:AM | ||
Institutions | 10/21/2021 10:21:AM | ||
|
text/x-c | 6.2 KB | 10/12/2019 01:53:PM |
|
text/plain | 2.5 KB | 10/12/2019 01:53:PM |
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Data with a large number of variables relative to the sample size—"high-dimensional data"—are readily available and increasingly common in empirical economics. High-dimensional data arise through a combination of two phenomena. First, the data may be inherently high dimensional in that many different characteristics per observation are available. For example, the US Census collects information on hundreds of individual characteristics and scanner datasets record transaction-level data for households across a wide range of products. Second, even when the number of available variables is relatively small, researchers rarely know the exact functional form with which the small number of variables enter the model of interest. Researchers are thus faced with a large set of potential variables formed by different ways of interacting and transforming the underlying variables. This paper provides an overview of how innovations in "data mining" can be adapted and modified to provide high-quality inference about model parameters. Note that we use the term "data mining" in a modern sense which denotes a principled search for "true" predictive power that guards against false discovery and overfitting, does not erroneously equate in-sample fit to out-of-sample predictive ability, and accurately accounts for using the same data to examine many different hypotheses or models.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
[institutions, abortion, judicial decisions, policy evaluation, growth, variable selection, machine learning]
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
C55 Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis
C55 Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
U.S. Circuits,
Country level data,
U.S. States
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
[observational data, program source code, aggregate data]
Methodology
Data Source:
View help for Data Source
Institutions: Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2001. "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation." American Economic Review 91(5): 1369-1401. Judges: Chen, Daniel L., and Susan Yeh. 2012. "Growth under the Shadow of Expropriation? The Economic Impacts of Eminent Domain." http:// www.sole-jole.org/13463.pdf. Abortion: Donohue, John J., III, and Steven D. Levitt. 2001. "The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime." Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2): 379- 420.
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
States,
Countries,
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.