Name File Type Size Last Modified
  Allcott-and-Taubinsky---TESSAudio 10/12/2019 01:54:AM
  Analysis 10/12/2019 01:54:AM
Allcott-and-Taubinsky---In-Store-Experiment-Protocol.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 24.3 KB 10/11/2019 09:54:PM
Allcott-and-Taubinsky---The-Lightbulb-Paradox---Replication-Instructions.pdf application/pdf 5.2 KB 10/11/2019 09:54:PM

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Imperfect information and inattention to energy costs are important potential motivations for energy efficiency standards and subsidies. We evaluate these motivations in the lightbulb market using a theoretical model and two randomized experiments. We derive welfare effects as functions of reduced-form sufficient statistics capturing economic and psychological parameters, which we estimate using a novel within-subject information disclosure experiment. The main results suggest that moderate subsidies for energy-efficient lightbulbs may increase welfare, but informational and attentional biases alone do not justify a ban on incandescent lightbulbs. Our results and techniques generate broader methodological insights into welfare analysis with misoptimizing consumers. (JEL D12, D83, H21, H31, L67, Q41, Q48)

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
      D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
      H21 Taxation and Subsidies: Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
      H31 Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents: Household
      L67 Other Consumer Nondurables: Clothing, Textiles, Shoes, and Leather Goods; Household Goods; Sports Equipment
      Q41 Energy: Demand and Supply; Prices
      Q48 Energy: Government Policy


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.