Replication data for: Betting on Secession: Quantifying Political Events Surrounding Slavery and the Civil War
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Charles W. Calomiris; Jonathan Pritchett
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
AER_2013_1483_data | 10/19/2021 03:48:PM | ||
|
text/plain | 14.6 KB | 10/11/2019 09:32:PM |
Project Citation:
Calomiris, Charles W., and Pritchett, Jonathan. Replication data for: Betting on Secession: Quantifying Political Events Surrounding Slavery and the Civil War. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2016. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E112961V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Lincoln's election produced Southern secession, war, and abolition. Using a new dataset on slave sales, we examine connections between news and slave prices for the period 1856-1861. By August 1861, slave prices had declined by roughly one-third from their 1860 peak. That decline was similar for all age and sex cohorts and thus did not reflect expected emancipation without compensation. The decision to secede reflected beliefs that the North would not invade and that emancipation without compensation was unlikely. Both were encouraged by Lincoln's conciliatory tone before the attack on Fort Sumter, and subsequently dashed by Lincoln's willingness to wage all-out war. (JEL D72, D74, D83, G14, H77, N31, N41)
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
Transcribed sales records
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
D74 Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
G14 Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
H77 Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism; Secession
N31 Economic History: Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy: U.S.; Canada: Pre-1913
N41 Economic History: Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation: U.S.; Canada: Pre-1913
D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
D74 Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
G14 Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
H77 Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism; Secession
N31 Economic History: Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy: U.S.; Canada: Pre-1913
N41 Economic History: Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation: U.S.; Canada: Pre-1913
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
New Orleans, United States,
Louisiana, United States
Time Period(s):
View help for Time Period(s)
8/1856 – 8/1861
Universe:
View help for Universe
Complete sample of slaves sold in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, from Aug. 1856 to Aug. 1861
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
administrative records data
Collection Notes:
View help for Collection Notes
Sample collection process is similar to Fogel and Engerman's "The New Orleans Slave Sale Sample, 1804-1862." (ICPSR 7423) The unit of observation is the individual. For transactions with multiple slaves, individuals recorded in sequence. Children (aged less than 11 years) grouped with mothers.
Methodology
Data Source:
View help for Data Source
New Orleans Notarial Archives, New Orleans, LA. http://www.orleanscivilclerk.com/research.htm
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Enslaved Individual,
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.