Replication data for: Marry Your Like: Assortative Mating and Income Inequality
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Jeremy Greenwood; Nezih Guner; Georgi Kocharkov; Cezar Santos
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
codes_ggksPandP | 10/11/2019 10:15:PM | ||
|
text/plain | 14.6 KB | 10/11/2019 06:15:PM |
Project Citation:
Greenwood, Jeremy, Guner, Nezih, Kocharkov, Georgi, and Santos, Cezar. Replication data for: Marry Your Like: Assortative Mating and Income Inequality. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2014. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-11. https://doi.org/10.3886/E112795V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Has there been an increase in positive assortative mating? Does assortative mating contribute to household income inequality? Data from the United States Census Bureau suggests there has been a rise in assortative mating. Additionally, assortative mating affects household income inequality. In particular, if matching in 2005 between husbands and wives had been random, instead of the pattern observed in the data, then the Gini coefficient would have fallen from the observed 0.43 to 0.34, so that income inequality would be smaller. Thus, assortative mating is important for income inequality. The high level of married female labor-force participation in 2005 is important for this result.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
D31 Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
J12 Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure; Domestic Abuse
D31 Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
J12 Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure; Domestic Abuse
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.