Name File Type Size Last Modified
20111535_ReadMeData.pdf application/pdf 16.9 KB 10/11/2019 05:31:PM
20111535_analysis.do text/plain 4.7 KB 10/11/2019 05:31:PM
20111535_data.dta application/octet-stream 67.8 KB 10/11/2019 05:31:PM

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Some researchers have argued that anchoring in economic valuations casts doubt on the assumption of consistent and stable preferences. We present new evidence that explores the strength of certain anchoring results. We then present a theoretical framework that provides insights into why we should be cautious of initial empirical findings in general. The model importantly highlights that the rate of false positives depends not only on the observed significance level, but also on statistical power, research priors, and the number of scholars exploring the question. Importantly, a few independent replications dramatically increase the chances that the original finding is true.

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      C91 Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
      D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.