Name File Type Size Last Modified
10_Results1.do text/plain 14.9 KB 10/11/2019 01:59:PM
11_Tran4_merge.do text/plain 5.4 KB 10/11/2019 01:59:PM
12_Results2.do text/plain 7.5 KB 10/11/2019 01:59:PM
13_Results3.do text/plain 8 KB 10/11/2019 01:59:PM
1_Tran0.do text/plain 9.1 KB 10/11/2019 01:59:PM
2_Tran1.do text/plain 951 bytes 10/11/2019 01:59:PM
3_Tran2_2002.do text/plain 1.3 KB 10/11/2019 01:59:PM
4_Tran2_2004.do text/plain 1.2 KB 10/11/2019 01:59:PM
5_Tran3_2002.do text/plain 40.7 KB 10/11/2019 01:59:PM
6_Tran3_2004.do text/plain 42.9 KB 10/11/2019 01:59:PM

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Using a large dataset on web browsing and purchasing behavior we test to what extent consumers are searching in accordance to various search models. We find that the benchmark model of sequential search with a known price distribution can be rejected based on recall patterns found in the data as well as the absence of dependence of search decisions on prices. Our findings suggest fixed sample size search provides a more accurate description of search behavior. We then utilize the fixed sample size search model to estimate demand elasticities of online bookstores in an environment where store preferences are heterogeneous. (JEL D12, D83, L81)

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
      D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
      L81 Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.