Name File Type Size Last Modified
  data 10/11/2019 04:50:PM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/11/2019 12:50:PM

Project Citation: 

Eggertsson, Gauti B. Replication data for: Was the New Deal Contractionary? Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2012. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-11. https://doi.org/10.3886/E112501V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Can government policies that increase the monopoly power of firms and the militancy of unions increase output? This paper shows that the answer is yes under certain "emergency" conditions. These emergency conditions—zero interest rates and deflation—were satisfied during the Great Depression in the United States. The New Deal, which facilitated monopolies and union militancy, was therefore expansionary in the model presented. This conclusion is contrary to a large previous literature. The main reason for this divergence is that this paper incorporates rigid prices and the zero bound on the short-term interest rate. (JEL E23, E32, E52, E62, J51, N12, N42)

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      E23 Macroeconomics: Production
      E32 Business Fluctuations; Cycles
      E52 Monetary Policy
      E62 Fiscal Policy
      J51 Trade Unions: Objectives, Structure, and Effects
      N12 Economic History: Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Industrial Structure; Growth; Fluctuations: U.S.; Canada: 1913-
      N42 Economic History: Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation: U.S.; Canada: 1913-


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.