Nuevo Amanecer-II Baseline Paper Data
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Anna Napoles, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 41.8 KB | 07/11/2019 02:44:PM |
|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 41 KB | 07/10/2019 11:10:PM |
|
|
application/x-sas-data | 448 KB | 07/10/2019 09:22:PM |
|
|
application/x-sas | 27.6 KB | 07/10/2019 10:24:PM |
Project Citation:
Napoles, Anna. Nuevo Amanecer-II Baseline Paper Data. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-07-11. https://doi.org/10.3886/E110281V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Objectives:
Adapt a cognitive-behavioral stress management program (Nuevo Amanecer or NA) for rural Spanish-speaking Latina breast cancer survivors.
Methods: Applied a community-engaged translational model called the Transcreation Framework to develop the adapted program (NA-II), design a randomized control trial for community settings, identify recruiters and interventionists, and implement the trial. Assessed outcomes of breast cancer-specific quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast total and subscale scores; FACT-B), distress (Brief Symptom Inventory anxiety and somatization scales, PHQ-8 depression scale), and stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10); higher scores=more of the construct.
Results: Core components of NA were retained. Adaptations included simplifying materials, increasing skills practice, and adding stress management videos and graphics, healthy lifestyles information, and survivorship information. Interventionists were trained Latina breast cancer survivors. Rural Spanish-speaking Latinas with non-metastatic breast cancer were recruited and enrolled by community advocates. Of 231 women approached, 24% refused, 10% were ineligible, and 153 (66%) were randomized to the intervention or a wait-list control group. Age ranged from 28–88 years (mean 54.8, SD 10.5). The sample was vulnerable: 69% had < high school education, and more than half had only Medicaid or no insurance. Ninety-one percent were foreign born and 48% reported financial hardship in the past year. Baseline mean scores (SD; possible range) were: FACT-B total score, 73.7 (15.1; 0-108); emotional well-being, 14.4 (4.3; 0-20); functional well-being, 11.0 (2.9;0-16); social/family well-being, 13.6 (4.1; 0-20); physical well-being 17.4 (5.3; 0-24); breast cancer concerns 17.4 (4.7; 0-28); anxiety, 0.70 (0.76; 0-4); somatization, 0.70 (0.64; 0-4); depression, 6.7 (5.3;0-24); and perceived stress, 15.7 (7.3; 0-40).
Conclusions: Applying the Transcreation Framework to engage stakeholders in the design and implementation of community-based RCTs enhanced congruence with community contexts and recruitment of this vulnerable population. Baseline outcome levels suggest there is room for improvement.
Methods: Applied a community-engaged translational model called the Transcreation Framework to develop the adapted program (NA-II), design a randomized control trial for community settings, identify recruiters and interventionists, and implement the trial. Assessed outcomes of breast cancer-specific quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast total and subscale scores; FACT-B), distress (Brief Symptom Inventory anxiety and somatization scales, PHQ-8 depression scale), and stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10); higher scores=more of the construct.
Results: Core components of NA were retained. Adaptations included simplifying materials, increasing skills practice, and adding stress management videos and graphics, healthy lifestyles information, and survivorship information. Interventionists were trained Latina breast cancer survivors. Rural Spanish-speaking Latinas with non-metastatic breast cancer were recruited and enrolled by community advocates. Of 231 women approached, 24% refused, 10% were ineligible, and 153 (66%) were randomized to the intervention or a wait-list control group. Age ranged from 28–88 years (mean 54.8, SD 10.5). The sample was vulnerable: 69% had < high school education, and more than half had only Medicaid or no insurance. Ninety-one percent were foreign born and 48% reported financial hardship in the past year. Baseline mean scores (SD; possible range) were: FACT-B total score, 73.7 (15.1; 0-108); emotional well-being, 14.4 (4.3; 0-20); functional well-being, 11.0 (2.9;0-16); social/family well-being, 13.6 (4.1; 0-20); physical well-being 17.4 (5.3; 0-24); breast cancer concerns 17.4 (4.7; 0-28); anxiety, 0.70 (0.76; 0-4); somatization, 0.70 (0.64; 0-4); depression, 6.7 (5.3;0-24); and perceived stress, 15.7 (7.3; 0-40).
Conclusions: Applying the Transcreation Framework to engage stakeholders in the design and implementation of community-based RCTs enhanced congruence with community contexts and recruitment of this vulnerable population. Baseline outcome levels suggest there is room for improvement.
Funding Sources:
View help for Funding Sources
California Breast Cancer Research Program (21OB-0135)
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.