Mobile phone Short Message Service (SMS) as a malaria control tool: evidence from rural Ghana
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Aliyu Mohammed, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, School of Public Health
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
application/x-stata | 15.2 KB | 03/06/2019 06:44:AM |
|
application/x-stata | 14.6 KB | 03/06/2019 06:44:AM |
|
application/x-stata | 103.6 KB | 03/06/2019 06:45:AM |
Project Citation:
Mohammed, Aliyu. Mobile phone Short Message Service (SMS) as a malaria control tool: evidence from rural Ghana . Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-03-06. https://doi.org/10.3886/E108722V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Data from this study comes from a
theory-driven mHealth intervention which sought to assess the effect of voice SMS on the prevalence of malaria among children
under-five living in rural districts of Ghana, Sub-sahara Africa. A quasi-experimental study was conducted from Februray 2016 to March 2017 using a
random sample of 332 caregivers with children under-five from two rural health
districts, assigned to either an intervention or a control group. A two-stage cluster smpling was used to select the sample. Caregivers in
the intervention group received voice short message service (SMS) on
malaria prevention based on a behavior change theory to improve their health behaviors
and practice, once a week for twelve months, while caregivers in the control
group received none.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
behavior ;
health;
voice communications;
information technology
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
Ghana,
Sub-Saharan Africa
Time Period(s):
View help for Time Period(s)
2/9/2016 – 3/26/2017
Universe:
View help for Universe
Caregivers and children under-five from rural districts of Ghana
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
geographic information system (GIS) data;
survey data
Methodology
Response Rate:
View help for Response Rate
For this Survey data, which involved cross-sectional surveys at bseline and endline, all participants (332) participated at baseline. Six (6) participants dropped out at 12 months follow-up, giving a response rate of 98.2%.
Sampling:
View help for Sampling
A two-stage random cluster sampling method was employed; cluster selection and participants from households
Data Source:
View help for Data Source
Individual-sponsored surevy
Collection Mode(s):
View help for Collection Mode(s)
face-to-face interview;
on-site questionnaire;
other
Scales:
View help for Scales
Includes a Likert-type scale
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.