Name File Type Size Last Modified
CUNY-Analysis-File-documentation.do text/x-stata-syntax 2.5 KB 04/28/2014 07:34:AM
Cohort_2010---replicating-analysis-in-FGPA-relationships-literature-1.30.2014.do text/x-stata-syntax 15.5 KB 02/13/2019 08:47:AM
create-student-level-analytic-file-4.23.2014.do text/x-stata-syntax 30.7 KB 02/06/2019 08:21:AM
readme-for-aera-open-paper.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 21.2 KB 03/17/2014 06:57:AM

Project Citation: 

Koretz, Daniel. Prediction of freshman GPA from college-admissions and high school tests. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-02-13. https://doi.org/10.3886/E108441V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary The current focus on assessing “college and career readiness” raises an empirical question: how do high-school tests compare with college-admissions tests in predicting performance in college? We explored this using data from the City University of New York and public colleges in Kentucky. These two systems differ in the choice of college-admissions test, the stakes for students on the high-school test, and demographics. We predicted freshman grade-point average (FGPA) from high-school grade-point average and both college-admissions and high-school tests in mathematics and English. In both systems, the choice of tests had only trivial effects on the aggregate prediction of FGPA. Adding either test to an equation that included the other had only trivial effects on prediction. Although the findings suggest that the choice of test might advantage or disadvantage different students, it had no substantial effect on the over- and underprediction of FGPA for students classified by race/ethnicity or poverty.


Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources United States Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences (R305AII0420)



Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.