Survey of public healthcare providers-Reproductive care for adolescents-Mexico-2012

Name	File Type	Size	Last Modified
Extract-Quality-Data-Base-English.dta	application/x-stata	48.2 KB	02/24/2017 05:22:AM
Extract-Quality-Data-Base-English.xls	application/vnd.ms-excel	149.5 KB	02/24/2017 10:58:AM
Extracto-Base-de-Datos-Calidad-espanol.dta	application/x-stata	48 KB	02/24/2017 05:18:AM
Extracto-Base-de-Datos-Calidad-espanol.pdf	application/pdf	145.4 KB	01/31/2017 04:05:AM
Extracto-Base-de-Datos-Calidad-espanol.xls	application/vnd.ms-excel	146 KB	01/31/2017 04:21:AM
Sintaxis-Quality-data-base-translated-English.do	text/x-stata-syntax	2 KB	01/31/2017 04:22:AM
Variable-names--explanation--value.xlsx	application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet	38 KB	02/24/2017 05:18:AM

Project Citation:

Lazcano-Ponce, Eduardo. Survey of public healthcare providers-Reproductive care for adolescents-Mexico-2012. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2017-02-24. https://doi.org/10.3886/E100464V2

Project Description

Summary: This study is an excerpt from a larger study called Monitoring care for women in public health sector services, carried out in Mexico during 2012; a report on this larger study (methodology including sample and a summary of results) can be found in Spanish here: https://www.insp.mx/produccion-editorial/novedades-editoriales/3102-monitoreo-mujeres.html. This cross-sectional study had a complex, probabilistic, stratified sampling design, representative at the national, regional and rural/urban level in Mexico. Questionnaires on different types of healthcare for women (maternal care, family planning, etc.) were applied to healthcare providers who worked in each type of healthcare, in 926 healthcare units. Relating to this excerpt, a questionnaire was collected from one provider each at 505 primary care units that provided sexual and reproductive healthcare to female and male adolescents. At each healthcare unit all personnel providing reproductive healthcare services to adolescents were listed and one provider was randomly selected and interviewed by a trained fieldworker using a structured questionnaire. All participants signed consent forms; the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mexico’s National Institute of Public Health. Data collection spanned August to October 2012. The questionnaire collected information about: the public institution each healthcare unit was affiliated to, rural/urban location, geographic region (North, Center, South and Mexico City-Mexico State which is a geographically smaller but densely populated region of the country), demographic information for the healthcare provider responding to the questionnaire, quality of care provided and other characteristics of available infrastructure and services provided to adolescents. The file is an excerpt that contains data about the variables listed in the previous sentence, referring only to sexual and reproductive healthcare services for adolescents.

Funding Sources: INMujeres (www.inmujeres.gob.mx) provided funding for this study.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms: adolescents; ; health care services; healthcare delivery

Geographic Coverage: Mexico

Time Period(s): 8/1/2012 – 10/31/2012 (August 2012 to October 2012)

Collection Date(s): 8/1/2012 – 10/31/2012 (August 2012 to October 2012)

Universe: The universe were public healthcare units in including all healthcare units in each of the four major public healthcare institutions that exist in Mexico: the Public Employees Social Security and Services Institute (Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado, ISSSTE); the Mexican Institute of Social Security (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, IMSS); Social Security for the Underserved (called IMSS-Oportunidades at the time of the study, later the program name was changed to IMSS-Progresa), and the clinics of the Ministry of Health. Together, these segments provide coverage for 98% of the Mexican population.

Data Type(s): survey data

Collection Notes: The questionnaires were collected on laptop computers taken into the field by fieldworkers using Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI).

Methodology

Response Rate: The response rate to the survey was 93%.

Sampling: This study had a probabilistic, stratified sampling design to randomly select 926 public healthcare units from a sampling frame of all public healthcare units in the country. The sample of 926 healthcare units was selected through systematic sampling of municipalities in each of five geographic regions: Northwest, Northeast, Center, South and Mexico City-Mexico State (geographically smaller but densely populated)). This sample was also representative for rural and urban areas. The sample included healthcare units from each of the four major public healthcare institutions in the country (Mexico) that were stratified by the level of care (primary, secondary, tertiary).

Data Source: Survey carried out by the research team at the INSP-National Institute of Public Health of Mexico.

Collection Mode(s): computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI)

Scales: No commonly used scales were included in the instrument.

Weights: The weights took into consideration the probability of selection of each healthcare unit. In the initial analysis of relative frequencies and confidence intervals, the weight assigned to each healthcare unit was used, which corresponds to the inverse of its probability of selection. To obtain 95% confidence intervals the complex sampling design was taken into account, using the SVY commands in Stata 12.0.

Unit(s) of Observation: healthcare units

Geographic Unit: region (Northwest Mexico, Northeast Mexico, Central Mexico, Southern Mexico and Mexico City-Mexico State)

Related Publications

Download this project

Published Versions

V2 [2017-02-24]

V1 [2017-02-24]

Export Metadata

Dublin Core

DDI 2.5

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.