Gender and STEM Africa
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Monica Fisher, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
Data | 12/01/2020 12:14:PM |
Project Citation:
Fisher, Monica. Gender and STEM Africa. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2020-12-01. https://doi.org/10.3886/E123142V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
The data
for this study was collected as part of a mixed-methods (qualitative and
quantitative) research study undertaken by the Regional Scholarship and
Innovation Fund (RSIF) with the objective of developing a gender strategy for
the program. RSIF is one of the flagship programs of the Partnership for Skills in
Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology (PASET), an Africa-led initiative
with the objective of strengthening the applied science, engineering, and
technology (ASET) capability in Africa to further its socio-economic
transformation. PASET was
launched in 2013 by the governments of Senegal, Ethiopia, and Rwanda with
facilitation by the World Bank. Other governments including Kenya, Cote D
Ivoire, Ghana, and Burkina Faso have since joined the initiative. RSIF has the following
objectives: (1) Create a stock of highly skilled scientists, professionals and
innovators in ASET areas; (2) Identify and nurture young talented Africans to
further their studies in ASET fields where expertise is needed most; (3)
Address imbalances in the number of women and disadvantaged groups in ASET
fields in Africa; and (4) Build African university capacity to provide relevant
ASET training and to ensure continued investment in scaling up ASET education
and workforce. The program seeks to achieve gender parity among its PhD
scholars.
This research study was approved by the Institutional Review
Board of the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe).
The study was approved because (a) it was a socioeconomic study that collected
data through an online SurveyMonkey survey with adult respondents (minors were
not involved in the study, no blood samples were taken from humans, and no
animals were involved), (b) the research questions were deemed as well defined
and analysis methods considered sound, (c) the study protocol outlined clear
strategies for protecting the privacy of the survey participants via data
anonymization, and (d) the online survey instrument provided an informed
consent form (described below).
The online survey was completed by 163 women and 64 men who had pursued a STEM
PhD at a university in SSA in the last 20 years. Probability sampling of
respondents was not possible, given the lack of a sample frame (i.e., a list of all recent PhD students in
STEM at SSA universities).
Survey participants were solicited by posting the survey link on the RSIF
website and sharing it with African-university professors known by the study’s
authors, representatives of organizations working to advance women in STEM (e.g.,
Mawazo Institute and Portia) who in turn shared it widely within their networks,
and former PhD students who had attended one of the 11 RSIF African host
universities (AHUs). The survey link specified that we sought participants
meeting the following criteria: former PhD student in a STEM field at an
African university that exited the PhD program (with or without a degree) in
the last 20 years.
The survey had
French and English versions and collected data on a range of variables
reflecting demographics, socioeconomic status, PhD funding sources, motivation
for pursuing a doctorate, psycho-social wellbeing during the PhD training,
perceptions of gender stereotypes and discrimination in the PhD program, university
resources (e.g., scientific writing course offered and presence of a gender and
diversity office), PhD performance, PhD completion, and persistence in STEM. The first page of the survey was a
standard informed consent form that described the voluntary nature of the
survey, data confidentiality, any potential risks and benefits, the expected survey
duration, and the types of information sought. Respondents
had to agree to the consent form electronically
in order to continue to the survey questions.
The
initial sample size was 262 individuals that completed the survey, which later
reduced to 227 after removal of respondents from universities outside SSA. Fig 3
shows the spatial distribution of the sample, covering 17 countries in West
Africa, East Africa, and southern Africa.
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.