Name File Type Size Last Modified
  20151398_analysis_files 10/12/2019 05:17:AM
  20151398_data_files 10/12/2019 05:17:AM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/12/2019 01:17:AM
readme_replication.pdf application/pdf 37.9 KB 10/12/2019 01:17:AM

Project Citation: 

Sampat, Bhaven, and Williams, Heidi L. Replication data for: How Do Patents Affect Follow-On Innovation? Evidence from the Human Genome. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2019. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E113100V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary We investigate whether patents on human genes have affected follow-on scientific research and product development. Using administrative data on successful and unsuccessful patent applications submitted to the US Patent and Trademark Office, we link the exact gene sequences claimed in each application with data measuring follow-on scientific research and commercial investments. Using this data, we document novel evidence of selection into patenting: patented genes appear more valuable—prior to being patented—than non-patented genes. This evidence of selection motivates two quasi-experimental approaches, both of which suggest that on average gene patents have had no quantitatively important effect on follow-on innovation.

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      I10 Health: General
      O31 Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
      O34 Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.