Name File Type Size Last Modified
  Interview-Instruments 01/27/2022 05:33:PM
MacArthur MHC Bibliography.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 13.5 KB 01/27/2022 12:33:PM
MacArthur-MHC-BL-and-6MO-ICPSR.sav application/x-spss-sav 28.6 MB 01/27/2022 12:31:PM

Project Citation: 

Policy Research Associates, Steadman, Henry J, and Redlich, Allison. MacArthur Mental Health Court Study. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-02-08. https://doi.org/10.3886/E100510V2

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary The MacArthur Mental Health Court (MHC) project is a longitudinal study examining the effectiveness of these specialty courts in reducing recidivism, reducing the number of jail days and stays, and increasing access to community mental health and substance use treatment. The study included four data collection sites (two in CA, one in MN, and one in IN), two samples (newly enrolled MHC clients and a comparison sample of offenders with mental illness in the traditional criminal justice system), two interview time points (baseline and 6-month follow-up), and the collection of objective criminal justice and court data up to 18 months post-enrollment in the MHC/post-arrest. This comprehensive project was funded by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Network on Community Mandated Treatment, led by Professor John Monahan, and was conducted by Policy Research Associates (Principal Investigator: Dr. Henry J. Steadman). 
Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Research Network on Community Mandated Treatment

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms mental health; trial courts
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Hennepin County, MN, Marion County, IN, Santa Clara County, CA, San Francisco County, CA
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 4/20/2004 – 1/20/2008
Collection Date(s):  View help for Collection Date(s) 11/22/2005 – 8/28/2008
Universe:  View help for Universe Newly enrolled mental health court (MHC) participants in four locations
Newly arrested offenders with mental health issues in four locations


Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) administrative records data; survey data
Collection Notes:  View help for Collection Notes Survey data at baseline (entry into MHC or criminal justice system)
Survey data at 6-month follow-up
Administrative data from courts

Methodology

Sampling:  View help for Sampling There were two samples: MHC and TAU (treatment as usual) samples.
The MHC sample were newly enrolled clients in the four participating courts who provided informed consent to participate.
The TAU sample were newly arrested offenders with mental health problems in the jails of the same four cities as the courts, who also provided informed consent. In addition, the TAU sample had to be eligible for the MHC (criteria relating to criminal charges and mental health) but could not have been referred to, or rejected from the MHC. 


Data Source:  View help for Data Source Self-report interviews at baseline and 6-months later. 
Administrative court records


Collection Mode(s):  View help for Collection Mode(s) face-to-face interview
Scales:  View help for Scales Several Likert scales were used.
Colorado Symptoms Inventory
Insight and Treatment Attitudes Questionnaire
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Individuals, Arrests

Related Publications

Request Information

This material is sensitive in nature and is available as restricted data through ICPSR. Users are required to apply for access, will be required to pay a fee, and will experience a wait time before access is given. The material will be distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR does not check or process the material.

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.