Name File Type Size Last Modified
2012fall_opens_all_IDs-Redacted application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 215.6 KB 04/19/2016 02:46:PM
Michigan Public Policy Survey Restricted Use Datasets: Fall 2012 Data User's Guide and Codebook application/pdf 1.8 MB 04/21/2016 11:27:AM
fall2012-restricted application/x-spss-sav 432.7 KB 04/19/2016 02:07:PM
fall2012-restricted application/x-stata 434.8 KB 04/19/2016 02:07:PM
fall2012-restricted text/csv 610.8 KB 04/19/2016 02:07:PM
fall2012-restricted text/html 434.8 KB 04/19/2016 02:07:PM
fall2012-restricted text/plain 610.8 KB 04/19/2016 02:07:PM

Login to generate citation for this folder.

To view the citation for the overall project, see http://doi.org/10.3886/E100148V10.

Folder Description

Summary:  View help for Summary The Fall 2012 MPPS was the eighth wave in the MPPS survey program. The primary focus of the survey was on how local jurisdictions engage with their citizens and how citizens engage with the jurisdictions' officials and employees. This survey ran from October 8 to December 11, 2012 and received responses from 72% of jurisdictions. 

Scope of Folder

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms technology; community decision making; social media; political participation; local government; citizen participation; civic engagement; internet
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Michigan
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 10/8/2012 – 12/11/2012 (Fall 2012)
Universe:  View help for Universe
3,523 top elected and top appointed officials from all 1,856 Michigan
counties, cities, villages, and townships
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) survey data

Methodology

Response Rate:  View help for Response Rate 72% by jurisdiction; 41% by individual respondent
Sampling:  View help for Sampling
The sample for the Fall 2012 MPPS included on average two officials from each of the local
general purpose units of government (83 counties, 277 cities, 256 villages, and 1,240 townships)
in the state of Michigan. The sample frame included, where the position existed and was not
vacant, the top elected and top appointed official in each jurisdiction. For counties, this consisted
of county administrators and board chairs; for cities, mayors and city managers; for villages,
village presidents and managers. Townships are a special case, in that, typically, their governing
officials are all elected. Therefore, in townships, both the elected supervisors and the elected
clerks were administered surveys, as well as a the few appointed township managers.
Collection Mode(s):  View help for Collection Mode(s) mail questionnaire; web-based survey
Weights:  View help for Weights
The Fall 2012 dataset includes two separate weights—one for individual-level and one
for jurisdiction-level analyses—that should be used to account for nonresponse at the
individual and jurisdictional levels, respectively. The variable samp_juris can be used to select
cases according to whether analysis is being done at the individual-level or jurisdiction-level.
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Jurisdiction, Individual

Related Publications

Request Information

This material is sensitive in nature and is available as restricted data through ICPSR. Users are required to apply for access, will be required to pay a fee, and will experience a wait time before access is given. The material will be distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR does not check or process the material.

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.