A newer version of this project is available. See below for other available versions.

Michigan Public Policy Survey Public Use Datasets

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy

Version Title: View help for Version Title Spring 2009-Fall 2017

Name	File Type	Size	Last Modified
Budget-and-Fiscal-Health-Data			05/01/2017 10:09:AM
Census-and-Redistricting-Data			05/01/2017 10:09:AM
Economic-Gardening-Data			05/01/2017 10:10:AM
Employee-Wages-and-Benefits-Data			05/01/2017 10:10:AM
Federal-Stimulus-Package-Data			05/01/2017 10:10:AM

To view the citation for the overall project, see http://doi.org/10.3886/E100132V26.

Folder Description

Summary: The Spring 2010 MPPS wave focused on fiscal, budgetary and operational issues, as well as economic development issues. Additional batteries of questions focused on intergovernmental cooperation, trust in federal, state, and other local governments, land-use planning, and the federal stimulus package.

In order to protect respondent confidentiality, we have divided the data collected in the Spring 2010 Michigan Public Policy Survey into separate datasets focused on different topics that were covered in the survey. Each dataset contains only variables relevant to that subject, and the datasets cannot be linked together. A more complete dataset, containing all questions asked in Spring 2010 is available for researchers through openICPSR's Virtual Data Enclave.

Scope of Folder

Subject Terms: government revenue; government spending; budgets; government services; federal stimulus; economic development; trust in government

Geographic Coverage: Michigan

Collection Date(s): 4/14/2010 – 6/17/2010 (Spring 2010)

Related Publications

Download this folder

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Dublin Core

DDI 2.5

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.